March 10th, 2010 
maya 
Hand tobacco smoke in a chair packaging, clothing, and remove the causal factors of skin cancer, according to the magazine of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, said the boss.
Berkeley scientists in the United States a number of laboratory tests and found that the levels of toxins in the material means that the smoke.
They said the smoke was expelled from the chamber was reduced secondhand smoke, but they still bear the scar, so the possibility of adverse effects they can achieve.
There are a number of parties is watching this one stupid term created to intimidate the public.
Scientists say that the nicotine stains on clothing and household appliances can be a response to these pollutants in the chamber, and the production of harmful chemicals called tobacco-specific nitrosamines, or Tsna.
The investigation shows that the area exposed to toxic substances in the levels of nitric acid, “high enough” – to the equipment and cars are gas fumes – increased 10 fold Tsna new to.
Much of Tsna juag found in the truck in heavy smokers.
The researchers said that passive smoking the third is the risk to health is not considered important.
So I have proposed a ban on smoking in homes and vehicles to reduce overall risk.
Cancer Chemicals
Toxic elements in cigarette smoke can live on surfaces long after the cigarette is disabled.
Children are particularly vulnerable because they are probably close to breathe, and even lick and suck.
Lara Gundel, a researcher at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory says: “out of smoking is better than the rest of nicotine, but will stick to clothing and skin of smokers.
“Time of cigarette smoking and the subsequent spread everywhere, and children most at risk.”
“The skin of the baby will absorb the nicotine in smokers back, usually Nitrous acid appears in the sky, and then Tsna be formed.”
Now they continue to seek better understanding of the risk if a Tsna.
Amanda Sandford of Action on Smoking and Health said: “The effect of smoking on the other hand, if poorly known, but this study gives a new aspect of the dangers of smoking, and provide additional evidence of the need to protect children from passive smoking .
“This study shows the rest of the possibility of smoke in the area, but it is likely that the cancer is still unknown how much,” he added.
Smoking skeptical
But Simon Clark, director of smokers lobby Forest are still skeptical.
“Dose is a poison and there is no evidence of risk exposure to such low levels,” he added.
“Does not seem a problem, and the goal is to care in the hope that people stop smoking it.
“The danger is not in the third cigarette smoke, but propadanda under the guise of science, the proof can not be questioned, as scholars and activists the urge to organize our lives to resist.”
Ed Yong, of Cancer Research UK, said: “This is the exciting part of the research, and increase the risk of tobacco smoke.
“There is clear evidence of the effects of passive smoking is bad for children, especially in homes and vehicles.
“The most important step that parents can do to protect the family from the dangers of passive smoking to homes and vehicles smoke-Fri”
Related posts:
Posted in Uncategorized 
